WiFi routers are safe at normal distances in homes and offices
Verdict:
Power density at 1m is 1,000x+ below ICNIRP safety limits. Decades of research with no consistent evidence of harm at these levels.
The science behind invisible technology
IEEE 802.11 from 11 Mbps to 46 Gbps. How OFDM, MIMO, and beamforming work. Why your router operates 1,250x below safety limits.
| Standard | Year | Frequency | Max Speed | Modulation | Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 802.11b | 1999 | 2.4 GHz | 11 Mbps | DSSS/CCK | ~35m indoor |
| 802.11a | 1999 | 5 GHz | 54 Mbps | OFDM | ~25m indoor |
| 802.11g | 2003 | 2.4 GHz | 54 Mbps | OFDM | ~35m indoor |
| 802.11n (Wi-Fi 4) | 2009 | 2.4/5 GHz | 600 Mbps | OFDM + MIMO | ~45m indoor |
| 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5) | 2014 | 5 GHz | 6.93 Gbps | OFDM + MU-MIMO | ~35m indoor |
| 802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6/6E) | 2020 | 2.4/5/6 GHz | 9.6 Gbps | OFDMA + MU-MIMO | ~35m indoor |
| 802.11be (Wi-Fi 7) | 2024 | 2.4/5/6 GHz | 46.1 Gbps | OFDMA + MLO | ~35m indoor |
| Band | Channels | Range | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GHz | 14 | 2.400 - 2.4835 GHz | |
| 5 GHz | 45 | 5.150 - 5.825 GHz | |
| 6 GHz | 59 | 5.925 - 7.125 GHz |
Typical router: [object Object]
FCC limit:
Safety margin:
| Material | Attenuation | Effect |
|---|---|---|
| Drywall/Plasterboard | 3-4 dB | |
| Wood door | 3-4 dB | |
| Glass window | 2-3 dB | |
| Brick wall | 6-10 dB | |
| Concrete wall | 10-15 dB | |
| Reinforced concrete | 15-25 dB | |
| Metal/foil | 20-30+ dB | |
| Water (human body) | 15-25 dB per body |
| Protocol | Year | Encryption | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEP | 1997 | RC4 (64/128-bit) | Broken |
| WPA | 2003 | TKIP (RC4-based) | Deprecated |
| WPA2 | 2004 | AES-CCMP (128-bit) | Acceptable |
| WPA3 | 2018 | AES-GCMP (128/256-bit) | Recommended |
Verdict:
Power density at 1m is 1,000x+ below ICNIRP safety limits. Decades of research with no consistent evidence of harm at these levels.
Verdict:
Multiple large-scale epidemiological studies (UK Million Women Study, Danish Cohort) show no increased cancer risk. Power levels are orders of magnitude below those used in animal studies showing any effect.
Verdict:
Double-blind provocation studies consistently fail to show that self-reported "electrosensitive" individuals can detect WiFi presence above chance. Nocebo effect is the most supported explanation.
Verdict:
WiFi has only been widespread since ~2000. No long-term studies spanning 30+ years exist yet. However, given the extremely low power levels (100-1000x below limits that already include large safety margins), most physicists consider the theoretical risk negligible.